Notice: Welcome to TinyChan, an account has automatically been created and assigned to you, you don't have to register or log in to use the board, but don't clear your cookies unless you have set a memorable name and password. Alternatively, you can restore your ID. The use of this site requires cookies to be enabled; please cease browsing this site if you don't consent.

TinyChan

Topic: I need feminism because...

+Anonymous A4.5 years ago #24,116

tumblr_m8kjdv1A3C1rnyewg.jpg

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4.5 years ago, 38 seconds later[T] [B] #289,377

fuckalms.jpg

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4.5 years ago, 49 seconds later, 1 minute after the original post[T] [B] #289,378

fuckalms.jpg

+kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 53 seconds later, 2 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #289,379

I invite you to post a screen shot of your tc history, and I'll do the same. I'd like to see who makes the most "feminism" topics.

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4.5 years ago, 3 seconds later, 2 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #289,380

fuckalms.jpg...and how is feminism going to fix this one?

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #289,381

I've challenged you! Respond accordingly!

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #289,382

ifyoureadthisyouarefuckalms.png@previous (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
Now you

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #289,383

@289,380 (A)
Seriously... How is feminism going to fix this? Does it have some kind of active plan? Because just as many men must be in the same situation, is feminism going to fun some 3rd world countries to give women education?

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #289,384

fuckalms.jpg...in other words she was shitfaced and it's just as possable she said yes as she said no.

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 9 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #289,385

@289,383 (A)
that isnt your main account, you fraud

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4.5 years ago, 47 seconds later, 9 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #289,386

fuckalms.jpg@previous (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
I don't have a "main" account. Now post your history. Honor your side of the agreement.

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 52 seconds later, 10 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #289,387

@289,383 (A)
Actually this isnt about funding necessarily but social convention. In some places it is illegal for women to get an education

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 41 seconds later, 11 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #289,388

@289,386 (A)
You're a liar. I'll post mine, when you post something that isnt brand new

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4.5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 13 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #289,390

@289,387 (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
So what plan does feminism have for those women and how does having 60million women out of education effect her, a western women? Do I need MRA because millions more men die doing dangerous manual jobs like construction, security and armed forces even those I'm not in any of those?

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4.5 years ago, 52 seconds later, 14 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #289,391

@289,388 (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
How did I lie? this was a 'I'll show you mine if you show me yours' and I did. Now it's your turn.

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 15 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #289,392

fuckalms.jpgA key that unlocks many locks is a master key, a lock which is opened by many keys is a shitty lock.

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 17 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #289,393

fuckalms.jpg...in other words, if he regrets sex you're still going to jail for rape.

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 19 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #289,394

@289,390 (A)
Well actually, they work to find these things and also break social conventions that keep women from having an education. And yes, you might need "mra" to help with man being treated as chattel

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4.5 years ago, 13 seconds later, 19 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #289,395

fuckalms.jpg...In other words, 'I have herpies'

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 48 seconds later, 20 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #289,396

@289,391 (A)
Give me a moment and I'll create a new id, make two posts, and then screen shot it

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 44 seconds later, 20 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #289,397

@289,392 (A)
Not even trying

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4.5 years ago, 1 second later, 21 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #289,398

@289,394 (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
And how do they do that other than taking their tops off and running around with their tits out...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2336312/Feminist-protesters-strip-outside-embassy-support-activists-trial-Tunisia-holding-topless-demonstration.html

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 22 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #289,399

@289,396 (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
You asked to see my ID ITT. You got that ID, now show your ID with the one you posted with ITT.

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4.5 years ago, 43 seconds later, 22 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #289,400

fuckalms.jpg

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 7 seconds later, 22 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #289,401

@289,398 (A)
Probably because it shocks people into paying attention, though topless women should not be illegal as its not illegal to have topless men. Also I dont agree with this type of protest, because all it does is give men a "free show"

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 37 seconds later, 23 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #289,402

@289,399 (A)
I didnt specify "this topic" show me every id that you have and I'll do the same

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 25 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #289,403

Or are you a chicken shit?

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 32 seconds later, 26 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #289,404

@289,395 (A)
Okay, this one is crazy. lol

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 35 seconds later, 26 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #289,405

@289,400 (A)
It isnt a compliment

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 4 minutes later, 31 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #289,407

Also, lets ask for a mod confirmation on this. Because you've proven yourself untrustworthy.

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 32 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #289,408

Oh, I see that you're the same person who accused Mr Larkin of baiting me. Why not post a topic on scatchan accusing him of doing so?

+Anonymous C4.5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 35 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #289,409

@previous (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
> Oh, I see that you're the same person who accused Mr Larkin of baiting me. Why not post a topic on scatchan accusing him of doing so?

Then you have access to his IP.

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 36 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #289,410

@289,407 (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
Fine. Any mod may look at my IP and tell you how many ID's are linked to it. I think it's about one or two because I'm new here.

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4.5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 39 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #289,411

fuckalms.jpg

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4.5 years ago, 6 minutes later, 45 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #289,412

fuckalms.jpg

+ducky !LZ0E5ojVGY4.5 years ago, 23 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,413

@289,393 (A)
wat

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 26 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,414

@289,410 (A)
Show your ids, you coward

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 40 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,415

@289,409 (C)
chicken shit

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 36 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,416

@289,413 (ducky !LZ0E5ojVGY)
He believes that drunk women cant be raped, because he's a beta mouthbreather

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 40 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,417

@289,409 (C)
But larkin already has your ip, right?

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 30 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,418

Show your other ids, you mongrel

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4.5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,419

fuckalms.jpg@289,416 (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
I didn't say that. The point was a drunk woman can agree to sex in the same way a drunk man. However, if she can't remember what happened the night before or is ashamed of it she can cry rape and ruin a mans life. In other words you need solid evidence to convict someone of rape.

@289,414 (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
I've held up my end of the deal, you're the one being a coward, Kook.

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,421

fuckalms.jpg@289,418 (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
Why should I when you've shown that you won't hold your end of the deal?

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 27 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,422

@289,419 (A)
You've been a deceptive fuck. show your ids.

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 33 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,423

@289,421 (A)
coward

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,425

I see that you also posted that bogus kotaku article. You're a fucking loser

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4.5 years ago, 4 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,426

@289,422 (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
@289,423 (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
How have I been deceptive? You asked for my ID and you got it. Just because it wasn't what YOU wanted doesn't make me a coward.

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,428

@previous (A)
Yes it does. Dont try and play dumb, you fucking tool,

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4.5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,431

fuckalms.jpg@previous (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
You're a sore loser, Kook. You asked for my ID and got it. Now you won't show yours. You've shown you can't be trusted so if I did have another ID I wouldn't post it in case it isn't good enough for you.

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4.5 years ago, 55 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,432

fuckalms.jpg

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,433

@289,431 (A)
I like how you didnt post your correspondence with larkin, only posted a new id, and wouldnt post a link to that "real" Kotaku article. Long story short, you're a lying scumbag. Thanks

(Edited 23 seconds later.)


·Anonymous A (OP) — 4.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,435

fuckalms.jpg@289,413 (ducky !LZ0E5ojVGY)
This is the truth, Ducky.

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,437

Lies http://www.tinychan.org/topic/24114

More lies http://www.tinychan.org/topic/24106

What are you hiding, dipshit?

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4.5 years ago, 9 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,438

@289,433 (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
I don't speak to scatman and I have new ID's all the time, sorry if that offends you. However, I do know that rapeculture is someone scatman is coaching. I received this from a reliable source.

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 37 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,439

@previous (A)
You just said in another topic that you have spoken to scatman. Another lie

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4.5 years ago, 30 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,440

fuckalms.jpg@289,437 (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
I'm not hiding anything. What are you implying?

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 7 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,441

@289,438 (A)
Confront him about it

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 42 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,442

@289,440 (A)
You're hiding your other ids. Also, you have an erection for me, otherwise you wouldnt have made so many posts just for me. Thanks

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 36 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,443

Show us that Kotaku link

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 54 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,444

You wont pm me on scatchan, because you know that we've talked before. Coward

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4.5 years ago, 20 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,445

@289,439 (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
I never claimed to have spoken to scatman because I never have. In face I have never spoken to him on a forum.

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,446

@previous (A)
wheres that kotaku link? Why havent you confronted him on aiding toaster? Why wont you post your other ids?

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4.5 years ago, 15 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,447

@289,444 (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
I won't PM you on scatchan because I don't want to collect enough posts to be able to PM.

@289,442 (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
I have nothing to haie and I don't have an erection for you. I just wanted to talk about feminism.

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 27 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,448

Hey Ducky, this is what a loser does to blow off steam. Learn from it, so that you may spot them in the future

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 37 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,449

@289,447 (A)
Another lie. You name me in every thread. Cowardly loser

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 38 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,450

Show your other ids, you coward

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 34 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,451

Show that kotaku link. Show the conversation with your "source"

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4.5 years ago, 3 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,452

fuckalms.jpg@289,446 (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
> Why havent you confronted him on aiding toaster?

Because I don't care. I just wanted to tell you because it

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 48 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,453

@previous (A)
You dont care? If you didnt care, you wouldnt have mentioned it. Show the conversation with your "source"

(Edited 28 seconds later.)

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 38 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,454

Show the kotaku link

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 43 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,455

Show the conversation with your "source"

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 58 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,456

Where's that link? Where's the conversation? Where are your other ids?

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4.5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,457

fuckalms.jpg@previous (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
Calm down woman...

> Where's the conversation?
I didn't save it nor would I show it to anyone as it was a private convocation.

> Where are your other ids?
You didn't ask for all my ID's. I showed you my current one and you backed out of your deal.

> Where's that link?
The site removed it because it was an embarrassment but if you look she makes other stupid blogs.

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 43 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,458

@previous (A)
Liar

waffler

liar


perfect

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,459

@289,457 (A)
It cant be found on google or the wayback machine. How odd. Also, your other posts with fake kotaku articles couldnt be found. Even more odd

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 38 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,460

How were you corresponding with this "source" exactly?

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4.5 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,462

fuckalms.jpg@previous (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
IRC

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,463

You made this topic as well. Care to show us the links for these?

http://www.tinychan.org/topic/23631#reply_283316

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 48 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,464

Show all of your ids you chicken shit. Also, if someone is friends with you, they are not a credible source. thanks

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,466

fuckalms.jpg@289,463 (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
I didn't make that thread. It was scatmans friend, maybe to4str.

+Anonymous E4.5 years ago, 8 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,467

op
The real irony is kook is more male the female.

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,468

@289,466 (A)
So it was you? I figured

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 39 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,469

@289,467 (E)
whatever floats your boat

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,470

@289,468 (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
You figured wrong. I only took an interest in you after my I was told about scatman getting Rapeculture to make threads about you. I wanted to see what the fuss was all about.

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 6 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,471

So rapeculture guy, why go anon for this?

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 32 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,472

@289,470 (A)
liar. you just both happened to post fake kotaku articles?

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,475

Recreate the conversation with your "source" from memory

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #289,476

fuckalms.jpg@289,472 (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
Yes, they are quite popular on 4chan/v/. Also, they are not fake, they were taken down by Kotaku because of the bad press they created. Kotaku thought they were being pro-feminist by allowing it but it turned out the shitstorm was costing them website hits.

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,477

fuckalms.jpg@289,475 (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
Why should I do that? I was really giving you a heads up. I'm sorry I did now.

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 6 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,478

@289,476 (A)
Oh so they came from 4chan? thats not shocking, as they are known for their photoshops.

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 34 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,479

@289,477 (A)
Because you cannot do so. But thats okay

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,480

Are you implying that you've never sent me a pm on scatchan and also wouldnt mind me dropping the ip address of those pm's?

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4.5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,481

fuckalms.jpg@previous (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
I don't go to scatchan and I've never sent you a PM. I don't care if you drop someones IP address.

@289,479 (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
What? I said I won't because it was a private convocation. If I had something to prove I would just make one up.

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,483

@289,463 (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
this is the real article instead of the photoshopped version with the same dates, you lying asshole

http://kotaku.com/5985822/why-were-there-no-women-presenters-at-the-playstation-4-event

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 34 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,484

@289,481 (A)
You're not creative enough to make up something that would sound credible

+Syntax 4.5 years ago, 1 second later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,485

Its possible that OP is correct about the kotaku post.

I could not find the post yet did see comments about Dildo's that made no sense. (the day or two after)

It makes sense now IF a blog post was pulled.

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,487

@previous (Syntax )
I just proved one was a fake. Give me time and I'll do the others

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,488

@289,484 (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
Have you noticed that all you've done ITT is insult me. You asked for my ID, I posted it you then backed out because it wasn't good enough for you. I've answered all your questions, tried to start a discussion and all you have done is name call.

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,489

@previous (A)
Because you a sneaky slimebag who makes hate on posts for me. release your other ids

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4.5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,490

@previous (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
What will posting other ID's do for you?

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,491

@previous (A)
Prove that you're trustworthy and make me more likely to believe that you actually have an informant

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,492

@289,488 (A)
btw you didnt try to start a discussion because when I did discuss one of your "points" you didnt bother to respond

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4.5 years ago, 47 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,493

fuckalms.jpg@previous (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
What point is that?

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,494

Wait, you're new here, never been to scatchan, so which irc were you using?

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,496

@289,493 (A)
Any of them, you didnt bother

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4.5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,501

fuckalms.jpg@previous (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
Name one.

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,504

@previous (A)
scroll up, dipshit

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 53 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,505

Which irc were you using?

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4.5 years ago, 14 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,507

@289,504 (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
Name one, you can't so I don't need to scroll up.

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,508

@previous (A)
name the irc

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4.5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,511

@previous (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
Why?

+Anonymous G4.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,512

Kook needs feminism to calm the fuck down

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4.5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,514

@previous (G)
She needs a real man

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,517

@289,511 (A)
Because you're lying

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 41 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,518

@289,512 (G)
That makes no sense.

·Anonymous G4.5 years ago, 27 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,519

1317515229428324.png@289,514 (A)
Are you that real man Walter?

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 10 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,520

@289,514 (A)
I wont find that here. lol

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 36 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,521

@289,519 (G)
Its not walter. Its rapeculture and he pms me constantly

·Anonymous G4.5 years ago, 36 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,522

@289,518 (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
So why do you need feminism?

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 37 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,524

@previous (G)
Why do you need to engage me at all?

·Anonymous G4.5 years ago, 16 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,525

@289,521 (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
It is Walter, I'm chatting with him on IRC

·Anonymous G4.5 years ago, 43 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,526

@289,524 (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
Fine. Be like that. Bye

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 32 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,527

@289,525 (G)
screenshot

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 31 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,528

@289,526 (G)
bye bitch

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4.5 years ago, 25 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,530

@289,517 (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
Why would I lie? Just to create a 100+ reply thread?

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,532

@previous (A)
Because you have a hard on for me. thanks

·Anonymous G4.5 years ago, 8 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,537

@OP
Time to come clean wally. Let poor kook know you are only playing around

+Dr. Autphag !fvna3QzWVM4.5 years ago, 21 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,549

I hate kook and she was sufficiently floored on this thread. Good work, gentlemen.

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,550

@previous (Dr. Autphag !fvna3QzWVM)
Wow, for once, no word salad

·Anonymous G4.5 years ago, 48 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,551

@289,549 (Dr. Autphag !fvna3QzWVM)
No one hates kook. It's just fun rattling her cage.

·Dr. Autphag !fvna3QzWVM4.5 years ago, 14 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,552

@289,550 (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
> word salad

Pitifully thin-vieled femmecode for

"Waaah the complex grammatical syntax of men confuse me! Mommy make the mean, verbose, silver-tongued men stop!"

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 48 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,553

@289,551 (G)
I'm only here because I'm taking a harvest moon break

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 36 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,554

@289,552 (Dr. Autphag !fvna3QzWVM)
You must not be tweaking today

·Dr. Autphag !fvna3QzWVM4.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,556

@previous (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
I am, just slightly less than usual. I'm also experimenting with the nootropics at Antikhristos' advisory.

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 49 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,557

@previous (Dr. Autphag !fvna3QzWVM)
Not being mean, but I can tell that you're feeling better

·Anonymous G4.5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,558

@289,553 (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
You've been nag posting in this thread for three hours, because you want the post history, ip address, and true identity of whoever dares post about feminism in any sort of joking way.

Is that why you need feminism? So you have something to nag about?

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 47 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,559

@previous (G)
No, because he's making false claims and lying. He hasnt said anything negative, just posted other peoples pics

·Dr. Autphag !fvna3QzWVM4.5 years ago, 45 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,560

@289,557 (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
I'm not sure if it's too early to tell (this would be a good time for Antikhristos to interject) but my thinking feels a lot clearer.

·Dr. Autphag !fvna3QzWVM4.5 years ago, 55 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,561

@289,559 (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
Not all of the claims about feminism are false and he doesn't appear to be slandering you beyond having posted as your name once or twice.

·Anonymous G4.5 years ago, 7 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,562

@289,559 (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
> Every chan post ever.

What an outrage. You must need feminism

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,564

@289,561 (Dr. Autphag !fvna3QzWVM)
I've never mentioned slander. I'm referring to his own false posts and photoshop

(Edited 11 seconds later.)

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 34 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,565

@289,562 (G)
If this seems like outrage to you, than you need to get out more

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 48 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,567

@289,560 (Dr. Autphag !fvna3QzWVM)
How long has it been?

·Dr. Autphag !fvna3QzWVM4.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,568

@previous (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
Maybe coming up to a week.

·Anonymous G4.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,569

@289,565 (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
Do you need feminism when you get out more? There's false claims and lying out there, other peoples pics too. You'll need special feminist vigilance

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,570

@289,568 (Dr. Autphag !fvna3QzWVM)
Thats pretty good. Are you feeling a sense of achievement?

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 32 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,571

@289,569 (G)
that barely made sense

·Anonymous G4.5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,572

@previous (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)

> No, because he's making false claims and lying. He hasnt said anything negative, just posted other peoples pics

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 5 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,574

@previous (G)
yes yes, honey. You did a good job with that one. I should just ignore posts meant for me, because I need feminism.

(Edited 25 seconds later.)


·Anonymous G4.5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,575

@previous (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
> Woman logic

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,576

@previous (G)
sweet. that was creative

·Dr. Autphag !fvna3QzWVM4.5 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,577

@289,570 (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
Not really. Just a wild sense of suspension from reality (as in, empirical reality, not cognitive --- I'm not out of my mind, just drawn into it), which has allowed me to become more cold and brutally objective than ever, but without feeling angsty, resentful, or infuriated about it; it's a natural state of flow from which I don't feel the need to drive myself.

(Edited 53 seconds later.)


·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,578

@previous (Dr. Autphag !fvna3QzWVM)
Were you frequently angry before this? Did you have wild mood swings?

·Dr. Autphag !fvna3QzWVM4.5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,579

@previous (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
Angry isn't the correct word for it, at least, not outwardly. I just felt this internal cumulative build-up of pressure to which I was addicted. I believe Grandin (though I really don't like her for political reasons, but her science, strictly speaking, is okay on everything except autism, ironically her field) once summed it up as an adrenalin addiction.

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,581

@previous (Dr. Autphag !fvna3QzWVM)
Okay I can understand that. What kind of political views does Temple hold?

·Dr. Autphag !fvna3QzWVM4.5 years ago, 7 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,583

@previous (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
She possibly holds connections to the Lubevich Chabad, my source being the author of The Jews and Communism: A Source Reader, who was interviewed once on a Spengola show. He regaled an anecdote about how Temple was once sent as an emissary by Greenpeace on behalf of some obscure Zionist group to attest the eco-friendliness and treatment of animals at this Kosher butchery or abbatoir of some sort. To cut a long story short: she changed her tune several years later when threatened, sooth-sayed and treated to sweet-nothings by the Jews in question behind this showcase inspection. Temple has shown other connections to the Jews, by I can't recall all of the facts off the top of my head at this moment. I've been considering writing an article on that, as well as the dangers of her brainchild, the "neurodiversity movement", which I believe ties into the greater Trotskyist cultural deconstruction plot.

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,585

@previous (Dr. Autphag !fvna3QzWVM)
So she was against the kosher treatment of animals and then changed her mind due to pressure from a shady, Jewish political group?

·Dr. Autphag !fvna3QzWVM4.5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,586

@previous (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
That's it in brief, yes; he mentioned other things pertaining to her though, that detail just sticks saliently in my mind because I was shocked hearing it. I bought his book the next day. Really intelligent guy.

·kook !!u4KQvs2JM4.5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #289,588

@previous (Dr. Autphag !fvna3QzWVM)
very interesting. thank you for telling me this

Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.

:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.